SPRINGFIELD — The other day I found myself standing on a bed changing a light bulb on a ceiling fixture.
My 3-year-old Caitlin asked me, “What are you doing, Daddy?”
I replied, “Changing a light bulb.”
She then asked her favorite question, “Why?”
I wish I knew the answer to that one. You see the bulb I was replacing was one of those squiggly energy efficient types that are supposed to last at least five years.
But this one burned out in less than one year.
You could say I learned my lesson and won’t replace it with that type of bulb again.
But, unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way.
Beginning Jan. 1, the U.S. government began phasing out 60 watt and 40 watt incandescent light bulbs. Last year, it did away with 100 watt incandescent bulbs.
So we are stuck with what the government says we can have – not necessarily what we want.
I know, I know, I can hear the chorus of voices saying “Scott, it’s only a light bulb.”
But it reflects a broader question in our society: Where should power rest — with the individual or with government?
Given a chance, most people make wise choices.
If florescent bulbs were superior to incandescent bulbs, folks would gravitate toward using them on their own — because they know over time they will save money with lower electric bills.
Instead, government made the choice for us.
To be more precise, the decision was made in 2007 by Congress and then-President George W. Bush.
But this sort of government-knows-best interference isn’t limited to light bulbs.
Just this year, Hawaii outlawed plastic shopping bags. And some folks would like the Land of Lincoln to follow suit.
Shouldn’t a question as basic as “paper or plastic?” be left in the hands of the consumer rather than some state bureaucrat?