Mt. Vernon Register-News

Opinion

December 5, 2013

Why families need a tax break for second earners

(Continued)

A popular explanation for the decline is the “opt out” revolution among high-income mothers. It’s true that, over the past two decades, participation rates among highly educated married women with children under age 6 have been falling. However, labor force participation has also been dropping among single women and women without children, recent research by Diane Macunovich of the University of Redlands has shown. “What seems to have passed under the radar has been the significant change that has occurred among women without children under 18, especially those who are single,” Macunovich writes. “For women without children younger than 18, declines have been occurring since the early 1990s or even the late 1980s.”

Which brings us back to the proposed secondary-earner deduction. The broad declines in female employment suggest that concerns about labor force trends may extend beyond the low- and moderate-income married women with children who would benefit from the Kearney-Turner proposal. To keep the cost in check, they phase out their tax break as income rises above $110,000. Yet even higher-income secondary earners, the ones who are the embodiment of the opt-out phenomenon, can face relatively high marginal rates.

To be sure, no proposal is perfect; reforms don’t need to solve all problems to attenuate some. So the relevant question is whether the Kearney-Turner proposal addresses a real problem with a cost-effective solution. And the answer is yes.

The secondary-earner deduction would bolster the incentives for many secondary earners to find employment. And just maybe, as Congress approaches the end-of-year budget negotiations, liberals who want to help low- and moderate-income families and conservatives who worry about the deleterious effects of high marginal tax rates will find common ground in the Kearney-Turner proposal.

Text Only
Opinion
  • A rare experience Alexandra Petri’s editorial, “What exactly are we seeing in Ferguson” is well written and did something which has increasingly become a rare experience for me. Her article caused me to think!Petri makes the case for media coverage of American events,

    August 19, 2014

  • Naive? Simple? I will admit outright that I may be a little naïve and tend to look at things through a simple prism. I received a suggestion for a column with an accompanying article written by By Reed Abelson and Eric Lichtblau concerning the failure of our govern

    August 19, 2014

  • Don't pass 'coup clause' with a security waiver It is a sad reality that national security waivers often render human rights laws moot, inviting the government to overuse the loophole to accommodate immediate needs. The “coup clause,” which mandates foreign aid suspension to countries after a mili

    August 19, 2014

  • Clinton could end up like Gore Although we’re all still sort of pretending that it remains to be seen whether Hillary Clinton will run for president in 2016, she recently gave the most definitive confirmation she has to date of her impending candidacy. No, she didn’t say the words

    August 16, 2014

  • Guru will work for food ‘At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 140,000 people and was worth $28 billion dollars. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has beco

    August 16, 2014

  • Ferguson police fumbled protests From the chief of the police department to the president of the United States, government officials on Thursday promised a different approach to the racially-charged unrest in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson. But the situation demands a lot more tha

    August 16, 2014

  • A better tax code solution: taxing consumption According to much conventional wisdom, the flap over corporate “tax inversions” is just the latest evidence that the tax code needs a comprehensive overhaul like the one agreed to by congressional leaders and President Reagan in 1986.Whether you cons

    August 15, 2014

  • Attacking economic inequality ‘The question is, ‘How do we help people at the bottom rather than thwart people at the top?’” Harvard economics professor Gregory Mankiw, who served as a leading adviser to President George W. Bush and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney,

    August 15, 2014

  • Giving it all away Love. Hate. Success. Failure. Talents. Handicaps. Burdens. Color. Music. Differences. They are (contrary to cotton’s claim) the fabric of our lives. Imagine a world where it is all turned off, suppressed in a manufactured semblance of order. There is

    August 15, 2014

  • More they learn, less they like Democrats have long believed Obamacare would become more popular once it was fully in place and Americans got a chance to see it up close. So why is Obamacare less popular now than a few months ago? Because it is fully in place and Americans have had

    August 14, 2014

Twitter Updates
Facebook
Stocks