Mt. Vernon Register-News


April 9, 2013

Have you ever been schooled?


Hang on! Here comes the schooling. The original request was to change the statute of one representative for each 5,000 municipality to one representative for each 7,000 in population, which would give Mt. Vernon an additional representative. Nothing more intended! Somehow, this was changed to 7,500, which would have excluded Benton when presented to state representatives.

There was never any thought or any intention to exclude anyone presently represented; only to gain equal and fair representation for Mt. Vernon.

Somehow, another issue was added to the request — the right to remove a board member for "no cause." I want to repeat that "for no cause." I do not believe that anyone in any job or appointed position should be able to be removed "for no cause." That process reeks of political cronyism to me. The act states that a trustee may be removed for incompetence, neglect of duty, or malfeasance and at the end of their appointed term if not re-appointed. I also think that re-appointment should be based on performance and not opinion. I just find "no cause" to be abhorrent and unfair.

I am going back to the being schooled; how can a simple straight-forward request to add one additional member for Mt. Vernon based on population, water sales, taxes, etc., that our mayor understood and supported could turn into excluding Benton and removing board members for no cause shows me just how ignorant and naive I am.

If this is the way politics work, I shake my head in wonder. I still believe that Mt. Vernon deserves equal representation and that it is a matter of fairness.

I view the board as a responsible agent of the people they represent. They should work with management to make the best decisions for their customers. I learned the hard way to be very leery of having everyone agree with you. My work colleagues and I had a name for this — it was called "the yeah boss syndrome." The fastest way to lose your job in the management arena I played in was to have everyone agreeing with you and saying yes to all your ideas.

I believe that this principle applies even more so to government. There is nothing illegal or immoral about dissenting views. The relationship needed for success is open, confronting and trusting. Open transparency without hidden agendas is a must; you never get the best solutions without confrontation and you cannot have positive confrontation without absolute trust among members of the group.

Text Only
  • Close the tax loophole that sends US corporations overseas Since we last overhauled our federal tax code, in 1986, countries around the world have lowered their tax rates, leaving the United States with the highest corporate tax rate in the developed word. At the same time, the system has become full of inef

    July 29, 2014

  • College cost isn't big problem for poor students To judge by this summer’s banner policy proposals, the most important question for higher-education reform right now is giving students easier access to loans. But evidence from Canada suggests those changes won’t address the greater need: Getting mo

    July 29, 2014

  • Money not always the answer I really have to stop and think sometimes. I challenge my thought processes when I write these columns. I am having a hard time with this one. It appears to me that every time a governmental agency or any of the entities that spend other people’s mon

    July 29, 2014

  • Teachers unions' destructive behavior You can always count on the national teachers unions to behave badly at their annual conventions, and they certainly didn’t let us down this month. In doing so, however, they let down many of their members, along with students who are working hard to

    July 26, 2014

  • Workers of the world, curb your ambitions A group of Democrats introduced legislation this week to protect low-paid shift workers from last-minute changes in their schedules. The idea fits into an intriguing category of economic activism: Not trying to lift low-paid workers out of poverty, n

    July 26, 2014

  • State of the reunion ‘Katy! It’s been so long! How’ve you been?”My God, she’s gained so much weight I didn’t recognize her. It’s a good thing we’re all wearing nametags. I thought it was some distant cousin past due with triplets.“Bob! Long time, no see.”No hair, either.

    July 26, 2014

  • Fear indifference ‘Perhaps the Catholic church would volunteer to pony up some cash for the illegals’ care then? Hmm?”“Pope should stay out of it. Matter of civil laws, not church laws.”“Thinking that the pope should want the illegals to go to Argentina to get better

    July 25, 2014

  • A push for felon voting rights If advocates have their way, voting rights could be a new reality for the nation’s incarcerated.Full voting rights for felons is as hot a topic in Washington as voting rights in reverse pushed by voter-ID-tickled Republicans. But with new legislation

    July 25, 2014

  • Big insurers need better oversight Could Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. threaten the stability of the financial system? The U.S.’s top regulators are asking themselves this question as they consider whether Berkshire and other large insurers should come under Federal Reserve

    July 25, 2014

  • Questions for Obamacare after the ruling Tuesday, I outlined what we knew about Halbig v. Burwell, the case in which a federal appellate court ruled that subsidies for purchasing insurance under Obamacare can only be made available on marketplaces established by states. Now I propose to out

    July 24, 2014

Twitter Updates