MT. VERNON —
Your newspaper carried a story about Monday’s Rend Lake Conservancy District board meeting in which board member Jim Rippy supposedly insulted the general manager and most of the board members with a statement he had made during a debate about the need for water rate increases.
Frustrated over the board’s insistence on raising water rates when he felt no increase was needed, he simply said in a slightly testy way, “Do we ever consider our customers?” The story also correctly reported, “Other members of the board voiced their disapproval with the comment.”
Now I fail to see how any board member or anyone else could be insulted by his comment. If anyone is so thin skinned to be offended by such an innocuous statement, he or she should not be serving on a public board.
A board is a critical part of any organization. It is a place where individual members come together to establish policy. Each member must be allowed to probe, to challenge, and to question other members. It is in this way that better decisions are made. Moreover, it gives transparency to their actions.
I suspect that some board members were uncomfortable in answering such a question. To avoid it, they feigned to be insulted. This is a common tactic to dodge questions.
There are larger and underlying concerns to this story than whether one is offended by a statement made by a fellow board member, and it was these concerns that prompted Mr. Rippy to ask the simple question, and it is these issues that prompt me to defend Mr. Rippy in this matter.
The underlying concerns go to the fundamental way in which district services (water, recreation and sewer) are financed. I have heard Rippy say it many times, “We raise water rates we don’t need, we levy property taxes we don’t need and we borrow money we don’t need.”
I have had many conversations with Mr. Rippy since we first joined the board in 2005. Although I have not always agreed with him on all issues facing the district, I believe I understand his thoughts in these matters and concur with them. We view district finances in a different way than the general manager and Franklin County board members.
This is the source of his frustration and it is driven by his desire to give something back to our customers and taxpayers. Moreover, it is fueled by the knowledge there is not much that can be done about it with Franklin County controlling the board and on financial issues always voting in a block. Our only hope to prevail in the matters of district finances is to continue to bring pressure on board members by speaking out in public. Hence, this is the reason I write this letter and is the reason for his question, “Do we ever consider our customers?”
MT. VERNON —
- Teachers unions' destructive behavior You can always count on the national teachers unions to behave badly at their annual conventions, and they certainly didn’t let us down this month. In doing so, however, they let down many of their members, along with students who are working hard to
- Workers of the world, curb your ambitions A group of Democrats introduced legislation this week to protect low-paid shift workers from last-minute changes in their schedules. The idea fits into an intriguing category of economic activism: Not trying to lift low-paid workers out of poverty, n
- State of the reunion ‘Katy! It’s been so long! How’ve you been?”My God, she’s gained so much weight I didn’t recognize her. It’s a good thing we’re all wearing nametags. I thought it was some distant cousin past due with triplets.“Bob! Long time, no see.”No hair, either.
- Fear indifference ‘Perhaps the Catholic church would volunteer to pony up some cash for the illegals’ care then? Hmm?”“Pope should stay out of it. Matter of civil laws, not church laws.”“Thinking that the pope should want the illegals to go to Argentina to get better
- A push for felon voting rights If advocates have their way, voting rights could be a new reality for the nation’s incarcerated.Full voting rights for felons is as hot a topic in Washington as voting rights in reverse pushed by voter-ID-tickled Republicans. But with new legislation
- Big insurers need better oversight Could Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. threaten the stability of the financial system? The U.S.’s top regulators are asking themselves this question as they consider whether Berkshire and other large insurers should come under Federal Reserve
- Questions for Obamacare after the ruling Tuesday, I outlined what we knew about Halbig v. Burwell, the case in which a federal appellate court ruled that subsidies for purchasing insurance under Obamacare can only be made available on marketplaces established by states. Now I propose to out
- Pensions not the problem I see in last night’s Register-News paper that James Rippy has attempted to enlighten us on pensions in Illinois. I also notice he has written so often he no longer has the title “guest columnist.” It is obvious he has the time and energy to work on
- Impasse threatens border solution After more than a year of contentious debate, could Congress be any more divided over the issue of immigration? The answer is yes.In the House, positions are hardening over what to do about the tens of thousands of families and unaccompanied young im
- Take a lesson from Texas I like to eat at blue-collar diners and cafes, particularly when I’m on vacation.It’s a chance to step beyond the homogenized national chains and experience a bit of local flavor.And being a reporter, I like to chat up local folks to find out a bit a
- More Opinion Headlines