Mt. Vernon Register-News

Opinion

November 27, 2013

Pact has new entitlement: Afghan-o-care?

(Continued)

This, according to the agreement posted online this week by the Afghan foreign ministry, is the essence of the pact. (That’s why I’m betting the loya jirga votes aye.)

The U.S. State Department calls this online document a “draft,” but given that deliberations are underway in Kabul, it seems logical to presume that this same “draft” is now under loya jirga consideration.

It comes down to who is in command, and, according to the draft agreement, it’s not the U.S.

For one thing, U.S. forces can’t conduct combat operations in Afghanistan without Afghan approval.

For another, U.S. forces can’t conduct counterterrorism operations, even against al-Qaida-brand terrorists, without Afghan approval.

There is simply no long-term American interest that can be served if command is not in American hands.

So what is this agreement all about? “Advising, training, equipping, supporting, sustaining” Afghanistan’s hopelessly untutorable armies and police in every conceivable area -- in other words, propping up a hostile, corrupt sharia state where see-no-Islam policies and counterinsurgency strategy long ago failed to achieve utopian goals of “nation-building.”

The Obama strategy, if one can call it that, seems more calculated to cover up that colossal Bush-Obama policy failure than to advance American interests.

For years, I have believed that there are no American interests in Afghanistan, certainly not any that are advanced by a standing military presence.

The situation is even worse under an agreement that subordinates American actions to Afghan approval.

Under this draft agreement, even when Afghans deem joint action “appropriate,” it must include “full respect for Afghan sovereignty and full regard for the safety and security of the Afghan people, including in their homes.”

In other words, the draft agreement is a blueprint for making an Afghan’s home the Taliban’s castle -- the guaranteed safe haven against U.S. counterterrorist actions, a place where the rules of engagement will continue to incur undue risk for U.S. servicemen, and serve enemy ends.

Text Only
Opinion
  • Keeping up with the Comcast call-center fiasco I’ve been intending for a while to write about the Comcast call-center fiasco, but it’s hard to keep up: the story just gets weirder and weirder. Following the now-viral recording of the telephone call in which a customer service representative essen

    August 21, 2014

  • System needed for choosing House In the original conception of our Constitution, the House of Representatives was to be the branch of government that best reflected the will of the people. House members cannot serve without being elected — vacancies are not filled by appointees — an

    August 21, 2014

  • Dems plead for more money I’ve been getting a lot of email from Democratic fundraisers lately. They seem very worried about November’s elections.First came the highly publicized “Impeachment Red Alert” campaign, in which the Democratic congressional committee warned that Repu

    August 21, 2014

  • Why Obama shouldn't go to Ferguson On Monday, ABC’s Ann Compton asked President Barack Obama whether he would visit Ferguson, Missouri, amid the continued unrest. Obama didn’t give a firm answer, but he did suggest it’s probably not a good idea.“When they’re conducting an investigatio

    August 20, 2014

  • Food stamps' $80B secret spending program Imagine a government program that has exploded in size, is the subject of bitter partisan haggling and spends almost $80 billion a year in secret.No, not the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency or the Department of Homeland Secu

    August 20, 2014

  • Vouchers provide greater choice I was chatting the other day with a fellow who, along with his wife, homeschool his children. We joked about the stereotype: Moms in denim skirts.But then he expounded on the benefits his youngsters have derived from being taught at home: a customize

    August 20, 2014

  • A rare experience Alexandra Petri’s editorial, “What exactly are we seeing in Ferguson” is well written and did something which has increasingly become a rare experience for me. Her article caused me to think!Petri makes the case for media coverage of American events,

    August 19, 2014

  • Naive? Simple? I will admit outright that I may be a little naïve and tend to look at things through a simple prism. I received a suggestion for a column with an accompanying article written by By Reed Abelson and Eric Lichtblau concerning the failure of our govern

    August 19, 2014

  • Don't pass 'coup clause' with a security waiver It is a sad reality that national security waivers often render human rights laws moot, inviting the government to overuse the loophole to accommodate immediate needs. The “coup clause,” which mandates foreign aid suspension to countries after a mili

    August 19, 2014

  • Clinton could end up like Gore Although we’re all still sort of pretending that it remains to be seen whether Hillary Clinton will run for president in 2016, she recently gave the most definitive confirmation she has to date of her impending candidacy. No, she didn’t say the words

    August 16, 2014

Twitter Updates
Facebook
Stocks